Yellowstone National Park, which covers parts of Wyoming, Idaho and Montana, lies on top of a supervolcano that could effectively wipe out the United States if it were to explode. The last time it did, 640,000 years ago, it expelled 240 cubic miles (think about that) of rocky debris into the sky.
Early Thursday morning, residents of southern Montana feared the worst when a 5.8 magnitude earthquake shook the region. Though its epicenter was only 230 miles from Yellowstone, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) says the seismic activity was not irregular, and the supervolcano is not expected to erupt anytime soon.
"The location and focal mechanism solution of this earthquake are consistent with right-lateral faulting in association with faults of the Lewis and Clark line, a prominent zone of strike-slip, dip slip and oblique slip faulting trending east-southeast from northern Idaho to east of Helena, Montana, southeast of this earthquake," said the USGS.
Nevertheless, people were concerned.
Though the heightened seismic activity has stoked fears of a possible supervolcano eruption, Jacob Lowenstern of the USGS told Newsweek that it is not without precedent.
“The swarm in 2010 on the Madison Plateau lasted at least three weeks. In 1985, there was one that lasted several months,” he said. “Yellowstone has had dozens of these sorts of earthquake swarms in the last 150 years it's been visited. The last volcanic eruption within the caldera was 70,000 years ago. For magma to reach the surface, a new vent needs to be created, which requires a lot of intense geological activity.”
The USGS puts the odds of a volcanic eruption at 1 in 730,000. Even if an eruption were to occur, it would likely result in lava flow rather than a cataclysmic explosion. Though this would have an effect on Yellowstone, it would not bring about the end of the United States as we know it.
The 5.8 magnitude earthquake that hit Montana early Thursday morning may have knocked some dishes over and woke up a few residents, but the supervolcano made it through the night undisturbed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Added by the Moderators
This ZetaTalk explains the origin of this earthquake
SOZT
The spate of Montana quakes on July 6 had nothing to do with Yellowstone, nor with the pending ripping of the New Madrid Fault Line or adjustments along the San Andreas Fault Line. Due to the bowing stress the N American Plate has been enduring, pulling the continent in a diagonal direction, rock strata throughout the continent are put under stress. Lincoln, Montana lies just inside the rock strata that has been pushed over the plains during past Pole Shifts. This is a SEPARATE strata, not homogeneous with the underlying rock strata of the plains, and thus they do not move as one.
The diagonal stress on the N American Plate is relieved at the weakest points, causing quake swarms in Oklahoma,
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue433.htm
fissures in Arizona,
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue547.htm
snapping water mains in San Diego,
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue540.htm
sinkholes in Pennsylvania, and fracturing Alabama pipelines.
http://www.zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue522.htm
As the N American Continent is gradually pulled in a diagonal manner, the overriding rock strata at the edge of the plains will shatter when it is pulled away from the underlying plains strata. These are not deep quakes, but rather surface quakes, and should be expected to occur in the future.
EOZT
Source: http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/zetatalk-chat-for-july-31-2017 ;
The ‘Out of Africa’ theory - story is much more complicated. 260,000-year-old skulls could rewrite the human origin story
Map of sites and postulated migratory pathways associated with modern humans dispersing across Asia during the Late Pleistocene. Credit: Bae et al. 2017. On the origin of modern humans: Asian perspectives. Science. Image by: Katerina Douka and Michelle O'Reilly [Link image source: sciencedaily.com]
"16 November, 2017. A 260,000-year-old skull from China could rewrite the history of human evolution. A new analysis has found the skull is remarkably similar to the earliest known fossil of our species,found 6,200 miles (10,000 km) away in Morocco in June. This suggests modern humans aren't solely descended from Africans as scientists previously thought.
Anthropologist Jean-Jacques Hublin showing off one of the finds, a crushed human skull whose eye orbits are visible just beyond his fingertip. Credit: Shannon McPherron, MPI EVA Leipzig, independent.co.uk [Link, image source: independent.co.uk]
<...> This means all of our genes come from early humans from Africa, except for a few gained by interbreeding with human-like ancestors such as Neanderthals. But a 260,000-year-old skull found in Dali County in China's Shaanxi Province may rewrite this long-held theory. The 'Dali skull', uncovered in 1978, is remarkably complete, with its face and brain case still in tact." [2] - dailymail.co.uk
"7 December, 2017. <...> The analysis, published in the journal Science, reviews the plethora of new discoveries being reported from Asia over the past decade, which were made possible by technological advances and interdisciplinary collaborations, and shows that Homo sapiens reached distant parts of the Asian continent, as well as Near Oceania, much earlier than previously thought. Additionally, evidence that modern humans interbred with other hominins already present in Asia, such as Neanderthals and Denisovans, complicates the evolutionary history of our species.
New model: Multiple dispersals of modern humans out of Africa, beginning as early as 120,000 years ago
<...> For example, H. sapiens remains have been found at multiple sites in southern and central China that have been dated to between 70,000 and 120,000 years ago. Additional finds indicate that modern humans reached Southeast Asia and Australia prior to 60,000 years ago." [1] - ScienceDaily
Article Reference:
[1] Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. (2017, December 7). Revising the story of the dispersal of modern humans across Eurasia: Technological advances and multidisciplinary research teams are reshaping our understanding of when and how humans left Africa -- and who they met along the way. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 10, 2017 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/12/171207141724.htm
[2] Mailonline, H. P. (2017, November 16). The fossil that rewrites human history: 260,000-year-old Chinese skull suggests we descend from ASIAN as well as African ancestors. Retrieved December 10, 2017, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5084509/Ancient-skul...
Original Journals:
Bae, C. J., Douka, K., & Petraglia, M. D. (2017). On the origin of modern humans: Asian perspectives [Abstract]. Science, 358(6368). doi:10.1126/science.aai9067
Athreya, S., & Wu, X. (2017). A multivariate assessment of the Dali hominin cranium from China: Morphological affinities and implications for Pleistocene evolution in East Asia [Abstract]. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 164(4), 679-701. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23305